夏热冬冷地区绿色建筑碳排放计算及碳减排潜力研究——以宁波大学科技服务大楼为例
PDF下载 (117)孙杰威,严晓东*.夏热冬冷地区绿色建筑碳排放计算及碳减排潜力研究——以宁波大学科技服务大楼为例[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2024,37(2):57-64.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0809
SUN Jiewei,YAN Xiaodong.Analysis of carbon emission and carbon reduction potential of green buildings in hot summer and cold winter zone: a case of the Science and Technology Service Building of Ningbo University
[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2024,37(2):57-64.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0809
| Title: | Analysis of carbon emission and carbon reduction potential of green buildings in hot summer and cold winter zone: a case of the Science and Technology Service Building of Ningbo University |
| 作者: | 孙杰威, 严晓东* |
| Author(s): | SUN Jiewei, YAN Xiaodong |
| 关键词: | 绿色建筑; 碳减排潜力; 生命周期评 |
| Keywords: | DeST; green buildings; carbon reduction potential; life cycle assessment; DeST simulation |
| 分类号: | TU201.5 |
| DOI: | 10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0809 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 为研究我国夏热冬冷地区绿色建筑的全生命周期碳排放, 选取宁波大学科技服务大楼作为绿色建筑案例, 采用基于过程方法与投入产出法相结合, 计算全生命周期碳排放, 得出其碳排放总量为23992.799tCO2e, 碳排放指标为38.51kgCO2e·(m2·a)−1. 同时, 为探究各类绿色建筑的碳减排潜力, 提出了基于屋顶、外墙、外窗和空调系统的碳计算方法, 并分别屋顶增加光伏板、改变外墙材料、采用不同传热系数外窗, 以及地源热泵4进行模拟计算与原绿色建筑碳排放强度相比, 地源热泵、太阳能光伏板可以提升建筑碳减排潜力, 分别能减少8.02%和12.56%的碳排放量; 考虑外墙材料隐含碳后, 材料的选择对碳排放的影响较大, 而外窗传热系数的变化对碳排放影响不明显. |
| Abstract: | An existing green building is selected as case study to study the life cycle carbon emissions of green buildings in hot summer and cold winter zone in China. The total life cycle carbon emissions of 23 992.779 tCO2e and the average annual carbon emission index per unit area of 38.51 kgCO2e·(m2·a)−1 are obtained by combining the process-based method and input-output method. In order to explore the carbon emission reduction potential of various green building technologies, a calculation method for carbon emission reduction of green building technologies based on roof, exterior wall, exterior window and air conditioning system was proposed. The simulations were carried out from four aspects: adding photovoltaic panel roof, changing exterior wall material, adopting exterior window with different heat transfer coefficient, and replacing in situ source heat pump with ordinary air conditioning. The carbon emission intensity of those simulations was compared with that of the original green building. The results show that ground source heat pump and solar photovoltaic panel have better carbon emission reduction potential, which can reduce carbon emissions by 8.02% and 12.56% respectively. Considering the carbon implied by the external wall material, the selection of the material has a great influence on carbon emission, while the change of the heat transfer coefficient of the external window has no obvious influence on carbon emission |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1].潘毅群, 魏晋杰, 梁育民, 等. 绿色建筑节能技术在典型公共建筑运行中碳减排潜力评估[J]. 暖通空调, 2022, 52(4):83-89, 131. [2].李岳岩, 张凯, 李金潞. 居住建筑全生命周期碳排放对比分析与减碳策略[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 53(5):737-745. [3].WU X Y, PENG B, LIN B R. A dynamic life cycle carbon emission assessment on green and non-green buildings in China[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 149:272-281. [4].肖旭东. 绿色建筑生命周期碳排放及生命周期成本研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021. [5].ROBATI M, DALY D, KOKOGIANNAKIS G. A method of uncertainty analysis for whole-life embodied carbon emissions (CO2-e) of building materials of a net-zero energy building in Australia[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225:541-553. [6].WANG T, SEO S, LIAO P C, et al. GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: review of two case studies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56:484-493. [7].KANG Y T, XU W, WU J L, et al. Study on comprehensive whole life carbon emission reduction potential and economic feasibility impact based on progressive energy-saving targets: a typical renovated ultra-low energy office[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 58:105029. [8].彭卓, 郭春梅, 汪磊磊, 等. 绿色建筑全生命周期CO2排放敏感性与减碳潜力研究[J]. 天津城建大学学报, 2021, 27(6):436-441. [9].杜星璇. 夏热冬冷地区绿色建筑围护结构节能体系优化研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2019. [10].SU X, TIAN S C, SHAO X L, et al. Embodied and operational energy and carbon emissions of passive building in HSCW zone in China: a case study[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2020, 222:110090. [11].DONG Z, ZHAO K, LIU Y Q, et al. Performance investigation of a net-zero energy building in hot summer and cold winter zone[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43:103192. [12].张孝存, 王凤来. 建筑工程碳排放计量[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2022. [13].张孝存, 郑荣跃, 王凤来. 清单选择对乡村建筑物化碳排放的影响分析[J]. 工程管理学报, 2020, 34(3):51-55. [14].XU L, ZHANG S F, YANG M S, et al. Environmental effects of China’s solar photovoltaic industry during 2011–2016: a life cycle assessment approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170:310-329. [15].浙江省建设工程造价管理总站. 浙江省建设工程施工机械台班费用定额[M]. 北京: 出版社, 2018. [16]. WANG J Y, WU H Y, DUAN H B, et al. Combining life cycle assessment and Building Information Modelling to account for carbon emission of building demolition waste: a case study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172:3154-3166. [17].聂梅生, 秦佑国, 江亿. 中国绿色低碳住区技术评估手册[M]. 北京: 工业出版社, 2011. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期: 2023−08−18. 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址: http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目: 国家社会科学基金（19BJL041）. 第一作者: 孙杰威, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向: 绿色建筑碳排放. E-mail: 392883450@qq.com *通信作者: 严晓东, 副教授, 主要研究方向: 工程管理与信息化. E-mail: yanxiaodong@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
