不同冲刷阀门对雨水管道沉积物清洁效率的数值模拟研究
PDF下载 (160)冯昊飞,杜升涛.不同冲刷阀门对雨水管道沉积物清洁效率的数值模拟研究[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2023,36(6):85-92.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0405
Feng Haofei,Du Shengtao.Numerical study of different flushing gates on sediment cleaning efficiency in stormwater pipes[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2023,36(6):85-92.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0405
| Title: | Numerical study of different flushing gates on sediment cleaning efficiency in stormwater pipes |
| 作者: | 冯昊飞, 杜升涛 |
| Author(s): | Feng Haofei, Du Shengtao |
| 关键词: | 冲刷; 管道清淤; 自动冲刷装置; 沉积物侵蚀 |
| Keywords: | flushing; deposition; self-cleaning; erosion |
| 分类号: | TV142+.2 |
| DOI: | 10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2023.0405 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 城市雨污混合制管道中的沉积物会导致管道腐蚀、排水效率降低, 甚至管道堵塞, 影响城市正常运转. 在各种清洁方法中, 使用产生冲刷波的冲刷装置已被广泛认为是一种有效和经济的解决方案. 本文使用Flow-3D软件进行了一系列数值模拟计算, 通过与文献中的实验进行水动力和泥沙冲刷对比, 验证了该软件中泥沙冲淤模型的正确性, 在此基础上利用该模型研究了3种简化的自动冲刷装置对管道沉积物的清淤效率. 结果表明, 半开口阀门高度对冲刷效率存在直接影响, 阀门相对高度设置为0.2时冲刷效率最高. 在3种阀门冲刷作用下, 沉积层形态各异, 冲刷效率也存在差异. 开口阀门、倾倒式阀门、半开口阀门在冲刷下沉积床形态分别呈现直线形、V形和U形. 半开口阀门条件下, 清除全部沉积物所需的冲刷时间比开口阀门少30%. 与开口阀门和倾倒式阀门相比, 半开口阀门可分别节约75%和26%的水. |
| Abstract: | The sediment in urban rainwater and sewage pipes will lead to pipe erosion, reduce drainage efficiency and block the pipes, leading to the damage to the normal operation of the city. Among various cleaning methods, using self-cleaning devices that generate flushing waves to clean the sediment has been widely recognized as an effective and economical solution. In this paper, a series of numerical simulations were carried out using Flow-3D software. The model was verified by comparing the hydrodynamic and sediment erosion experiments in the literature. The flushing efficiency of three simplified automatic flushing devices for cleaning pipeline sediments was studied through simulation. The results showed that the height of half-open valve had direct influence on the scouring efficiency and the highest flushing efficiency was attained when relative height of the gate was 0.2. The sediment morphology and the scouring efficiency were different under the flush induced by three sluice types. The sediment bed morphology of open gate, tipping gate and half-open gate under scouring presented line shape, V shape and U shape, respectively. The flushed time of total sediment in half-open gate was 30% shorter than that in full-open gate. Compared with open gate and tipping gate, half-open gate can save 75% and 26% volume of water, respectively. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] 黄鑫妮, 康瑞鹏, 朱敏. 排水管网沉积物的特征、危害及控制措施[J]. 清洗世界, 2022, 38(11):182-184. [2] 黄乃先, 齐一凡, 金伟. 排水管道沉积物控制的研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(3):507-513. [3] Chen Y X, Shi X, Jin X, et al. Characteristics of overflow pollution from combined sewer sediment: Formation, contribution and regulation[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 298: 134254. [4] 刘振华, 李怀正, 董梦珂. 排水管道沉积物水力冲刷技术[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2015(2):1-3. [5] Safari M J S, Aksoy H. Experimental analysis for self- cleansing open channel design[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2021, 59(3):500-511. [6] Campisano A, Modica C, Creaco E, et al. A model for non-uniform sediment transport induced by flushing in sewer channels[J]. Water Research, 2019, 163:114903. [7] Dettmar J, Rietsch B, Lorenz U. Performance and operation of flushing devices - Results of a field and laboratory study[M/OL]//Strecker E W, Huber W C. Global Solutions for Urban Drainage. [2023-01-10]. https://doi.org/10.1061/40644(2002)291. [8] Guo Q Z, Fan C Y, Raghaven R, et al. Gate and vacuum flushing of sewer sediment: Laboratory testing[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(5):463-466. [9] Bertrand-Krajewski J L, Bardin J P, Gibello C. Long term monitoring of sewer sediment accumulation and flushing experiments in a man-entry sewer[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 54(6/7):109-117. [10] Shahsavari G, Arnaud-Fassetta G, Campisano A. A field experiment to evaluate the cleaning performance of sewer flushing on non-uniform sediment deposits[J]. Water Research, 2017, 118:59-69. [11] Bong C H J, Lau T L, Ab Ghani A. Potential of tipping flush gate for sedimentation management in open stormwater sewer[J]. Urban Water Journal, 2016, 13(5):486-498. [12] 刘翠云, 张效华, 杨钰婷, 等. 雨水管道沉积物冲刷特性[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(2):635-642. [13] Shirazi R H S M, Campisano A, Modica C, et al. Modelling the erosive effects of sewer flushing using different sediment transport formulae[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 69(6):1198-1204. [14] Campisano A, Modica C. Flow velocities and shear stresses during flushing operations in sewer collectors[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 47(4):123-128. [15] Schaffner J, Steinhardt J. Numerical investigations of sewer flushing sunk waves - Analysis of hydraulic boundary conditions and cleaning effectiveness[C]//8th International Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling, Tokyo, 2009. [16] Liu C Y, Lv W K, Liu Q, et al. Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2021, 84(6): 1340-1353. [17] 蒋隽睿. 排水管道内沉积物沉积模拟与分析研究[J]. 中国市政工程, 2014(2):35-37. [18] 周敬钦, 刘翠云, 周俊, 等. 排水管道内不同粒径沉积颗粒物冲刷率的分析与计算[J]. 环境化学, 2021, 40(3): 896-903. [19] 王建龙, 王泽熙, 李晗, 等. 雨水管道沉积物累积对过流能力影响的模拟试验[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3):732-737. [20] Mastbergen D R, Van Den Berg J H. Breaching in fine sands and the generation of sustained turbidity currents in submarine canyons[J]. Sedimentology, 2003, 50(4):625- 637. [21] Soulsby R. Dynamics of marine sands[M]. London: Thomas Telford Publications, 1997. [22] Meyer-Peter E, Müller R. Formulas for bed-load transport [C]//IAHSR 2nd Meeting, Appendix 2, Stockholm, 1948. [23] Campisano A, Creaco E, Modica C. Experimental and numerical analysis of the scouring effects of flushing waves on sediment deposits[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 299(3/4):324-334. [24] Tang Y B, Zhu D Z, Rajaratnam N, et al. Sediment depositions in a submerged storm sewer pipe[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 146(10):04020118. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期:2023-04-08.宁波大学学报（理工版）网址:http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目:国家重点研发计划（2022YFC3203200）;宁波市自然科学基金（2021J096）. 第一作者:冯昊飞（1998－）,男,浙江嘉兴人,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向:管道沉积物冲刷.E-mail:fenghfcdd@163.com *通信作者:杜升涛（1988－）,男,山东临沂人,博士/讲师,主要研究方向:城市水力学.E-mail:dushengtao@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
