利用物理与数值模型对旋流式水砂分离器性能的评估
PDF下载 (184)翁哲馨,钱 宇,高豆豆,杨丽芳,袁倩雯.利用物理与数值模型对旋流式水砂分离器性能的评估[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2024,37(6):43-50.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0406
WENG Zhexin,QIAN Yu,GAO Doudou,YANG Lifang,YUAN Qianwen.Performance evaluation of swirling hydrodynamic separators using physical and numerical models[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2024,37(6):43-50.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0406
| Title: | Performance evaluation of swirling hydrodynamic separators using physical and numerical models |
| 作者: | 翁哲馨, 钱 宇, 高豆豆, 杨丽芳, 袁倩雯 |
| Author(s): | WENG Zhexin, QIAN Yu, GAO Doudou, YANG Lifang, YUAN Qianwen |
| 关键词: | 计算流体动力学; 旋流式水砂分离器; 颗粒物去除效率; 物理模型; 数值模拟 |
| Keywords: | computational fluid dynamics; swirling hydrodynamic separators; particle removal efficiency; physical model; numerical simulation |
| 分类号: | TU823.6; X52 |
| DOI: | 10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0406 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 在市政环境工程领域, 旋流式水砂分离器(以下简称分离器)主要用于控制雨水排放过程中的总悬浮固体(TSS)浓度, 以减轻排放对自然水体潜在的负面影响. 为此研究一种特殊设计的分离器, 其主要特征为入口与出口切向连接产生旋流, 可增强颗粒的沉降和分离. 利用实验模型和数值模拟对该分离器效能进行综合分析, 探究其在不同流量条件下对不同粒径颗粒物的去除率, 以及分离器尺寸大小对颗粒物去除率的影响. 结果表明: 在流量为5L·s−1以上时, 对粒径小于200μm的颗粒物, 去除率下降显著; 对粒径大于200μm的颗粒物, 由于其受水流作用较弱, 沉降速度较快, 去除率相对较高. 此外, 流量的增加导致流速增大, 水停留时间缩短, 进而降低了颗粒物的去除率. 研究发现, 当分离器直径增大至原设计的1.5倍时, 颗粒物的去除率最大可提升28%. 同时, 引入Péclet数评估方法, 作为衡量颗粒物去除率的关键指标. 该研究结果可为分离器的设计和优化提供参考, 有助于提高分离器在实际应用中的性能. |
| Abstract: | In the field of municipal environmental engineering, hydrodynamic separators are primarily used to control the concentration of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in stormwater discharge to mitigate its potential negative impact on natural water bodies. This paper studies a specially designed hydrodynamic separator, whose core feature is the tangential connection of the inlet and outlet to generate a vortex, which can enhance the sedimentation and separation of particles in stormwater. Both experimental models and numerical simulations are used to analyze the separator’s performance comprehensively, by exploring its removal efficiency for particles of different sizes under various flow conditions, as well as the impact of the separator's size on the particle removal rate. The results show that, when the flow rate is above 5 L·s−1, the removal efficiency decreases significantly for particles smaller than 200 μm; while for particles larger than 200 μm, it would have a faster sedimentation rate and relatively higher removal rate due to weaker water flow effects. Additionally, an increase in flow rate shall lead to an increase in flow velocity thus a reduction in water retention time, and consequently a decrease in particle removal rate. The study also found that, when the diameter of the hydrodynamic separator is increased to 1.5 times that of the original design, the particle removal rate shall be increased by up to 28%. During study, the Péclet number assessment method is introduced as a key indicator for measuring the removal efficiency of particles. The research results can provide a reference for the design and optimization of hydrodynamic separators, thus help improve their performance in practical applications. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2022年城乡建设统计年鉴[EB/OL]. [2024-02-11]. https://www.mohurd. gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/sjfb/index.html.
[2] 周传庭, 王梦玉, 幸韵欣, 等. 城市初期雨水污染及处理措施的研究进展[J]. 净水技术, 2022, 41(7):17-26.
[3] 刘燕, 尹澄清, 车伍, 等. 合流制溢流污水污染控制技术研究进展[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 35(增刊1):282-287.
[4] 李继轩. 一种绿地雨水收集处理装置的研发[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2020.
[5] SAZAKLI E, ALEXOPOULOS A, LEOTSINIDIS M. Rainwater harvesting, quality assessment and utilization in Kefalonia Island, Greece[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(9):2039-2047.
[6] HELMREICH B, HORN H. Opportunities in rainwater harvesting[J]. Desalination, 2009, 248(1/2/3):118-124.
[7] ANGRILL S, PETIT-BOIX A, MORALES-PINZÓN T, et al. Urban rainwater runoff quantity and quality: a potential endogenous resource in cities?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 189:14-21.
[8] BAPTISTA I, RITSEMA C, QUERIDO A, et al. Improving rainwater-use in Cabo Verde drylands by reducing runoff and erosion[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 237/ 238:283-297.
[9] GB 50014—2021. 室外排水设计标准[S].
[10] US EPA. Compendium of ms4 permitting approaches, part 1: six minimum control measures[EB/OL]. [2024-02-11]. https://mostcenter.umd.edu/compendium-ms4-permitting- approaches-part-1-six-minimum-control-measures.
[11] 李枫, 赵嵘广, 邢雷, 等. 水力旋流器内固相颗粒运动行为分析[J]. 化学工程, 2023, 51(7):55-60.
[12] 汪家权, 蒋文韬, 王淦. 新型高效旋流沉砂池除砂效果研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2007, 23(15):98-100.
[13] 王晓玲, 周莎莎, 郎建, 等. 旋流沉砂池除砂废水流场与结构参数优化模拟[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(6):300- 307.
[14] 徐冉云. 雨水旋流处理器的改进优化[J]. 中国给水排水, 2016, 32(24):44-48.
[15] 马倩倩, 蔡欣, 丁怡斐. 旋流分离器在合流制溢流污染控制中的应用进展[J]. 绿色科技, 2016(2):68-70.
[16] FAN C Y, FIELD R, LAI F H. Sewer-sediment control: overview of an environmental protection agency wet-weather flow research program[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 129(4):253-259.
[17] MAMOON A A, JAHAN S, HE X L, et al. First flush analysis using a rainfall simulator on a micro catchment in an arid climate[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 693:133552.
[18] 邱峰, 汪家权, 王淦. 新型旋流沉砂池除砂和有机物分离效率的研究[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2008, 39(3):84-87.
[19] 邵林广. 圆形涡流式沉砂池除砂效率的探讨[J]. 给水排水, 1998, 24(12):38-40.
[20] 高郑娟, 孙朝霞, 贾海峰. 旋流分离技术在雨水径流和合流制溢流污染控制中的应用进展[J]. 建设科技, 2019(3):96-100.
[21] 周赛军, 任伯帜, 邓仁健. 蓄水绿化屋面对雨水径流中污染物的去除效果[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26(5):38- 41.
[22] RODI W. Turbulence modeling and simulation in hydraulics: a historical review[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2017, 143(5):03117001.
[23] SANSALONE J J, PATHAPATI S S. Particle dynamics in a hydrodynamic separator subject to transient rainfall- runoff[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45:W09408.
[24] GANJARE A V, PATWARDHAN A W. CFD study of effect of particles on flow patterns and separation in settling tank[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2023, 149(1):04022032.
[25] Andoh B. Computer simulation saves in design of hydrodynamic vortex separator[J]. Industrial Water World, 2005, 6(3):18-19.
[26] PATHAPATI S S, SANSALONE J J. CFD modeling of a storm-water hydrodynamic separator[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 135(4):191-202.
[27] GB 3838—2002. 地表水环境质量标准[S].
[28] FERZIGER J H, PERIĆ M, STREET R L. Computational methods for fluid dynamics[M]. 4th ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2019.
[29] WILSON M A, MOHSENI O, GULLIVER J S, et al. Assessment of hydrodynamic separators for storm-water treatment[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 135(5):383-392.
[30] YANG Y Z, HUANG B, ZHU D Z. Experimental study of sediment washout from stormwater sumps[J]. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2022, 86(9): 2454-2464.
[31] VIALLE C, BUSSET G, TANFIN L, et al. Environmental analysis of a domestic rainwater harvesting system: a case study in France[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 102:178-184. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期: 2024−04−03. 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址: http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目: 浙江省重点研发计划（2020C03082）. 第一作者: 翁哲馨, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向: 城市排水. E-mail: 2111087071@nbu.edu.cn *通信作者: 钱宇, 副研究员, 主要研究方向: 城市排水. E-mail: qianyu@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
