象山港黄墩支港菲律宾蛤仔种群COI和ITS1基因序列特征及遗传多样性分析
PDF下载 (774)李明云,王礼闪,苗 亮,穆方申,杜静雅.象山港黄墩支港菲律宾蛤仔种群COI和ITS1基因序列特征及遗传多样性分析[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2020,33(6):1-6.DOI:
LI Mingyun,WANG Lishan,MIAO Liang,MU Fangshen,DU Jingya.Sequence characteristics and analysis of genetic diversity based on COI and ITS1 of Ruditapes philippinarum population at Huangdun area in Xiangshan Port[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2020,33(6):1-6.DOI:
| Title: | Sequence characteristics and analysis of genetic diversity based on COI and ITS1 of Ruditapes philippinarum population at Huangdun area in Xiangshan Port |
| 作者: | 李明云, 王礼闪, 苗 亮, 穆方申, 杜静雅 |
| Author(s): | LI Mingyun, WANG Lishan, MIAO Liang, MU Fangshen, DU Jingya |
| 关键词: | 菲律宾蛤仔; 象山港黄墩支港; 序列特征; 遗传多样性; 线粒体细胞色素氧化酶I (COI); 内转录间隔区1 (ITS1); cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COⅠ) |
| Keywords: | Ruditapes philippinarum; Huangdun area in Xiangshan Port; sequence characteristics; genetic diversity; internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) |
| 分类号: | S917.4 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 为了解象山港黄墩支港菲律宾蛤仔种质资源的遗传多样性现状, 采用COI和ITS1分子标记对该种群进行了基因序列特征和遗传多样性分析. 结果表明 在该种群30个个体中扩增得到的COI基因序列长度均为709bp, ITS1序列长度范围在693~729bp(共有746个位点). COI基因序列的位点中有670个保守位点(占94.50%)、39个变异位点(占5.50%); ITS1序列的位点中有保守位点671个(占89.95%)、变异位点62个(占8.31%)和缺失/插入位点13个(占1.74%). COI基因序列的保守性高于ITS1序列. 在COI基因序列中碱基(A+T)的占比(65.84%)高于(C+G), 而ITS1序列中则是碱基(A+T)占比(37.59%)低于(C+G). COI和ITS1序列的遗传距离分析均显示群体内遗传分化不明显. 基于COI基因序列和ITS1序列构建的遗传进化树显示 各科贝类分别相聚, 象山港菲律宾蛤仔位于帘蛤科的分支中, 其COI序列与杂色蛤进化关系最近. 遗传进化树中各种贝类的聚类关系与传统分类学结果相一致, 可作为分类的参考. COI和ITS1序列的平均核苷酸差异数分别为5.497和6.549, 核苷酸多样性指数分别为0.00775和0.00973, 单倍型数目分别为21和28, 单倍型多样性分别为0.963和0.993, 根据COI和ITS1两个序列计算得到的菲律宾蛤仔象山港群体单倍型多样性均大于0.5, 核苷酸多样性指数均大于0.005, 表明该种群遗传多样性丰富, 并处于稳定状态. 本研究结果补充了菲律宾蛤仔遗传多样性方面的研究资料, 并可为象山港菲律宾蛤仔种质资源保护和遗传育种提供理论基础. |
| Abstract: | The present study was designed to understand the status of genetic diversity of Ruditapes philippinarum at Huangdun area in Xiangshan Port. A total number of 30 R. philippinarum samples were collected. The sequence characteristics and genetic diversity of COI and ITS1 molecular markers were analyzed. The results showed that the sequence lengths of COⅠ gene of the samples were all 709bp and the ITS1 sequence had total 746 loci. In addition, the sequence lengths were in the range of 693-729bp. In COⅠ gene sequence, there were 670 conserved sites (94.50%) and 39 variable sites (5.50%). There were 671 conserved sites (89.95%), 62 variable sites (8.31%) and 13 deletion/insertion sites (1.74%) in the total 746 loci of ITS1 sequence. The sequence conservation of COⅠ gene was significantly higher than that of ITS1 sequence. In COI gene sequence, the base content of (A+T) was 65.84% and was higher than (C+G). In the ITS1 sequence, the content of (A+T) was only 37.59% and was less than (C+G). The genetic distance analysis based on COI and ITS1 showed that there was no significant genetic difference between groups. The phylogenetic tree based on COⅠ and ITS1 showed that the shellfish of the same family grouped together. The R. philippiarum of was in the cluster of Veneridae and had the closest relationship of evolution to Venerupis variegata. The results of molecular phylogenetic tree were consistent with traditional classification. For R. philippiarum of , the average numbers of nucleotide differences were 5.497 for COI and 6.549 for ITS1. The nucleotide diversity indices were 0.00775 for COI and 0.00973 for ITS1. Haplotype numbers were 21 for COI and 28 for ITS1. Furthermore, haplotype diversity were 0.963 for COI and 0.993 for ITS1. The haplotype diversity of COⅠ and ITS1 were both greater than 0.5. The nucleotide diversity indices of these two sequences were both greater than 0.005. The results indicated that the R. philippinarum population at had rich genetic diversity and the genetic state was stable. The results provided theoretical basis for germplasm conservation and genetic breeding of the R. philippinarum population in |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] 李明云, 薛学朗, 冯坚, 等. 象山港黄墩支港菲律宾蛤仔的种群动态及其繁殖保护措施的探讨[J]. 生态学报, 1989, 9(4):297-303. [2] 张梦笛, 吕粼, 金狄狄, 等. 象山港大型底栖动物生产力空间插值及模型比较[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(4):21- 29. [3] 李明云, 薛学朗, 丁雪燕, 等. 象山港菲律宾蛤仔年龄与生长的研究[J]. 浙江水产学院学报, 1987, 6(2):111- 120. [4] 李明云, 刘祖祥. 对虾塘综合利用高产技术[M]. 杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 1991:104-172. [5] 张国范, 张福绥. 贝类遗传多样性及其永续利用(I)[J]. 海洋科学, 1993, 17(5):17-21. [6] 聂鸿涛, 李佳, 霍忠明, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔人工选育群体与野生群体的遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2016, 23(3):538-546. [7] Yasuda N, Nagai S, Yamaguchi S, et al. Development of microsatellite markers for the clam Ruditapes philippinarum[J]. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2006, 7(1): 43-45. [8] 路路, 秦艳杰, 喜武, 等. 基于转录组平台的蛤仔微卫星标记筛选[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(5):1573-1580. [9] 喜武, 虞志飞, 秦艳杰, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔EST-SSRs标记开发及不同地理群体遗传多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(15):4190-4198. [10] 牛泓博, 聂鸿涛, 朱德鹏, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔EST-SSR标记与生长性状的相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(6): 1910-1916. [11] 李旭光, 许广平, 阎斌伦, 等. 菲律宾蛤仔不同地理群体生化遗传结构与变异的研究[J]. 海洋科学, 2009, 33(4):61-65. [12] 刘相全, 包振民, 胡景杰, 等. 两种蛤仔群体遗传多样性的形态参数及AFLP分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2010, 41 (3):359-364. [13] Chen A H, Li Z X, Feng G N. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Meretrix (Mollusca: Veneridae) based on mitochondrial COI gene sequences[J]. Zoological Research, 2009, 30(3):233-239. [14] 孟学平, 高如承, 申欣, 等. 西施舌5个地理群体ITS1序列变异及系统发生分析[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(20): 5555-5561. [15] 胡利莎, 张振, 马培振, 等. 10个菲律宾蛤仔野生群体的遗传多样性研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2016, 47(3):549- 556. [16] Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, et al. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates[J]. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 1994, 3(5): 294-299. [17] King T L, Eackles M S, Gjetvaj B, et al. Intraspecific phylogeography of Lasmigona subviridis (Bivalvia: Unionidae): conservation implications of range discontinuity[J]. Molecular Ecology, 1999, 8(12/S1):S65- S78. [18] Hauswirth W W, Laipis P J. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in a maternal lineage of cows[J]. Proceedings of the of Sciences, 1982, 79(15):4686-4690. [19] 郭天慧, 孔晓瑜, 陈四清, 等. 三疣梭子蟹线粒体DNA 16S rRNA和COI基因片段序列的比较研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 34(1):22-28. [20] 郑文娟, 朱世华, 沈锡权, 等. 基于线粒体COI基因序列探讨泥蚶的遗传分化[J]. 动物学研究, 2009, 30(1): 17-23. [21] 孔晓瑜, 喻子牛, 刘亚军, 等. 中华绒螯蟹与日本绒螯蟹线粒体COI基因片段的序列比较研究[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 31(6):861-866. [22] 林元烧, 曹文清, 方旅平, 等. 中华假磷虾线粒体DNA COI基因片段序列分析[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 43(6):842-846. [23] 孙娜, 郭晓华, 刘广纯. 金龟子部分种类COI基因序列比较分析[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2009, 40(6):688-692. [24] 毕晓欣. 黑帽悬猴(Cebus apella)线粒体基因组全序列分析和菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)群体遗传学研究[D]. 烟台: 鲁东大学, 2012. [25] Navajas M, Lagnel J, Gutierrez J, et al. Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism[J]. Heredity, 1998, 80(6):742-752. [26] 孙桂金, 潘杰, 刘可春, 等. 毛蚶、泥蚶和魁蚶ITS1核苷酸序列分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2011(7):117-120. [27] Grant W S, Bowen B W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation[J]. Journal of Heredity, 1998, 89(5):415-426. [28] Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics[M]. : Press, 1987. [29] 董建宇, 胡成业, 杨晓龙, 等. 基于GLM模型Logistic回归的菲律宾蛤仔地理群体判别[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2018, 49(6):1318-1324. [30] 梁健, 王俊杰, 郭永军, 等. 不同地理群体菲律宾蛤仔表型性状的相关性与通径分析[J]. 水产科学, 2020, 39(1):40-47. [31] de Montaudouin X, Lucia M, Binias C, et al. Why is Asari (=) clam Ruditapes philippinarum fitness poor in : a meta-analysis to answer[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2016, 179:226-235. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期:2020-02-03.宁波大学学报（理工版）网址:http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目:长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT0734）. 第一作者:李明云（1942－）,男,浙江舟山人,博导/教授,主要研究方向:水产经济动物遗传育种、种质资源保护及增养殖.E-mail:limingyun@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
