陶粒泡沫混凝土基本力学性能试验统计分析
PDF下载 (168)饶超敏,梁哲为,朱元臣,吕 飞,王建民.陶粒泡沫混凝土基本力学性能试验统计分析[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2024,37(3):13-19.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0116
RAO Chaomin,LIANG Zhewei,ZHU Yuanchen,LÜ Fei,WANG Jianmin.Statistical analysis on the basic mechanical properties of aerated ceramsite concrete[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2024,37(3):13-19.DOI:10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0116
| Title: | Statistical analysis on the basic mechanical properties of aerated ceramsite concrete |
| 作者: | 饶超敏, 梁哲为, 朱元臣, 吕 飞, 王建民 |
| Author(s): | RAO Chaomin, LIANG Zhewei, ZHU Yuanchen, LÜ Fei, WANG Jianmin |
| 关键词: | 陶粒泡沫混凝土; 力学性能; 统计规律; 抗压强度; 抗拉强度 |
| Keywords: | aerated ceramsite concrete; mechanical property; statistic characteristic; compressive strength; tensile strength |
| 分类号: | TU582.2 |
| DOI: | 10.20098/j.cnki.1001-5132.2024.0116 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 陶粒泡沫混凝土应用于建筑外墙或预制装配式墙板保温体系时需同时兼顾质轻和相应结构强度要求, 且对材料相关性能的稳定性要求较高. 本文以建筑渣土陶粒为集料, 经过物理发泡制备了多批次陶粒泡沫混凝土, 通过试验统计研究了陶粒泡沫混凝土立方体抗压强度的概率分布、基本力学性能参数及相互关系. 结果表明: 立方体抗压强度整体更服从对数正态分布, 拟合判定系数达0.997. 轴心抗压强度与立方体抗压强度呈较稳定的线性关系, 换算系数区间在0.76~ 0.99, 而劈裂抗拉强度与抗压强度呈幂函数关系. 全体样本数据抗压强度稳定在5.9~7.6MPa范围. 此外, 立方体抗压强度低于7.5MPa的试块样本, 其抗拉强度值的离散性较小. |
| Abstract: | The requirements on lightweight, structural strength, and high stability on material properties have to be met for aerated ceramsite concrete (ACC) when using as insulation material in building’s exterior wall or the prefabricated wall panels. In this paper, several batches of ceramisite foam concrete were prepared by physical foaming with ceramisite from building waste soil as aggregate, the probability distribution of cube compressive strength, basic mechanical property parameters and their relationships of ceramsite foam concrete are studied by test statistics. The results indicate that, the cubic compressive strength preferably follows a logarithmic normal distribution that the coefficient of fitting determination is up to 0.997. A good linear relationship exists between the axial compressive strength and the cubic compressive strength, and the conversion factor is between 0.76-0.99. Comparatively, the splitting tensile strength and cubic compressive strength exhibits a power function relationship. Analyzing from the whole samples, the cubic compressive strength stably remains from 5.9-7.6MPa. In addition, the dispersion of tensile strength values is relatively smaller for samples that the cubic compressive strength value is not more than 7.5MPa. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1].IBRAHIM I A, ÖTVÖS T, GILMANOVA A, et al. International energy agency[C]//WOUTER J. Interna- tional encyclopaedia of laws. Alphen aan den Rijn, NL: Kluwer Law International, 2021. [2].侯恩哲. 《中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告2022(公共建筑专题)》发行[J]. 建筑节能(中英文), 2022, 50(4):146. [3].胡瑛莉. 粉煤灰页岩陶粒泡沫混凝土物理力学与导热性能研究[J]. 化学与粘合, 2023, 45(2):97-100, 113. [4].KEARSLEY E P, WAINWRIGHT P J. Porosity and permeability of foamed concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(5):805-812. [5].MASTALI M, KINNUNEN P, ISOMOISIO H, et al. Mechanical and acoustic properties of fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag foam concretes containing lightweight structural aggregates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 187:371-381. [6].ARUN K M, PRASANNA K, CHINNA R C, et al. Bond strength of autoclaved aerated concrete manufactured using partial replacement of flyash with fibers: a review [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 65:581-589. [7].QU X L, ZHAO X G. Previous and present investigations on the components, microstructure and main properties of autoclaved aerated concrete: a review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 135:505-516. [8].WANG Y S, QIU J P, ZENG C. Shrinkage and strength properties of coal gangue ceramsite lightweight aggregate concrete[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 2020:3575709. [9].GENCEL O, BALCI B, BAYRAKTAR O Y, et al. The effect of limestone and bottom ash sand with recycled fine aggregate in foam concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 54:104689. [10].SCHUMACHER K, SAMMANNSHAUSEN N, PRITZEL C, et al. Lightweight aggregate concrete with an open structure and a porous matrix with an improved ratio of compressive strength to dry density[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 264:120167. [11].WANG Q X, SHI Y X, SHI J B, et al. An experimental study on thermal conductivity of ceramsite cellular concrete[C]//International Conference on Structural, Mechanical amd Materials Engineering (ICSMME2015). Paris, France, Atlantis Press, 2015. [12].WANG X J, LIU L, ZHOU H Y, et al. Improving the compressive performance of foam concrete with ceramsite: experimental and meso-scale numerical investigation[J]. Materials & Design, 2021, 208:109938. [13].秦程. 陶粒泡沫混凝土的制备与性能研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018. [14].田雨泽, 耿玲, 李娜. 基于正交设计的陶粒泡沫混凝土配合比试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2017(12):169-172. [15].鹿健良, 孙晶晶. 陶粒泡沫混凝土配合比试验研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2012(9):60-62. [16]., 李家和, 张志春. 陶粒泡沫混凝土强度及其影响因素研究[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2002, 35:79-83. [17].易秋, 陈红鸟, 曾洲, 等. 陶粒泡沫混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 施工技术, 2018, 47(14):114-117. [18].GB/T 11969—2020. 蒸压加气混凝土性能试验方法[S]. [19].曾欢. 蒸压粉煤灰-砂加气混凝土应力—应变本构关系及其砌体力学性能试验研究[D], 湖南: 长沙理工大学, 2013. [20].GB 55008—2021. 混凝土结构通用规范[S]. [21].陆志扬, 沈明燕. C50混凝土推定抗压强度的概率统计分析[J]. 江西建材, 2015(13):9-10. [22].杨三强, 麻海燕, 余红发, 等. 碱式硫酸镁水泥混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2016, 35(8):2548- 2555. [23].何淅淅, 张延赫. 粉煤灰混凝土轴心抗拉强度与立方体抗压强度关系的试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(4): 130-133. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期: 2024−01−10. 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址: http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51878360）; 宁波市重点研发计划暨“揭榜挂帅”项目（2023Z075）. 第一作者: 饶超敏, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向: 混凝土结构. E-mail: 15542496231@163.com *通信作者: 王建民, 博士/教授, 主要研究方向: 结构抗震和防灾减灾. E-mail: wangjianmin@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
