组织忘却对组织惰性的影响研究—–环境动态性与创新导向的调节作用
PDF下载 (226)郭秋云,郭彤梅,徐巧玲,周晖杰.组织忘却对组织惰性的影响研究—–环境动态性与创新导向的调节作用[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2021,34(6):91-98.DOI:
GUO Qiuyun,GUO Tongmei,XU Qiaoling,ZHOU Huijie.The impact of organizational unlearning on organizational inertia:Regulatory functioning of environment dynamism and innovation[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2021,34(6):91-98.DOI:
| Title: | The impact of organizational unlearning on organizational inertia:Regulatory functioning of environment dynamism and innovation |
| 作者: | 郭秋云, 郭彤梅, 徐巧玲, 周晖杰 |
| Author(s): | GUO Qiuyun, GUO Tongmei, XU Qiaoling, ZHOU Huijie |
| 关键词: | 组织惰性; 组织忘却; 环境动态性; 创新导向 |
| Keywords: | organizational inertia; unlearning; environmental dynamism; innovation orientation |
| 分类号: | F272.4 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 组织惰性是客观存在于组织机体内的消极行为表现, 对组织的可持续发展产生阻碍作用. 如何克服组织惰性、提升组织效率是组织惰性研究的关键问题. 本文主要探讨了组织忘却对组织惰性的影响作用. 以长三角地区的260个调查样本为研究对象, 对组织忘却与组织惰性的关系进行了分析, 并探讨了环境动态性、创新导向以及环境动态性和创新导向交互在两者之间的调节作用. 结果表明 组织忘却对组织惰性具有显著的负向作用, 环境动态性和创新导向均显著正向地调节了两者之间的负向作用, 环境动态性和创新导向的交互对两者之间的关系具有调节作用, 但调节作用最强的情况出现在环境动态性或创新导向单方面较强, 而非环境动态性和创新导向两者均强时. |
| Abstract: | In the past researches have devoted a great deal of attention to the root causes of organizational inertia. However, little effort is made on the link between organizational learning and inertia. The purpose of this study is to examine how unlearning influences organizational inertia. We tested the hypotheses using a sample of 260 corporates in Yangzi River delta region in . The results indicate that unlearning negatively affects organizational inertia, whereas the environmental dynamism and innovation orientation positively moderate this negative relationship. Results of a three-way interaction suggest that the impact of unlearning on organizational inertia is stronger when the environment dynamism or innovation orientation stays at a high level instead of both being high at the same time. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] Feldman M S, Pentland B T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(1): 94-118. [2] Huang H C, Lai M C, Lin L H, et al. Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2013, 26(6):977-1002. [3] Nelson R R, Winter S G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change[M]. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982. [4] Liao S H, Fei W C, Liu C T. Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(4):183-195. [5] Akgün A E, Byrne J C, Lynn G S, et al. Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2007, 20(6):794-812. [6] Starbuck W H. Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies[J]. International journal of technology management, 1996, 11(7):725-737. [7] 许小东. 组织惰性行为初研[J]. 科研管理, 2000, 21(4): 56-60. [8] 白景坤, 荀婷, 张贞贞. 组织惰性: 成功的副产品, 抑或组织病症?—–基于系统性审查方法的述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(12):113-128. [9] Huber G P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):88-115. [10] Becker K. Individual and organizational unlearning: Directions for future research[J]. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 2005, 9(7):659-670. [11] Nedzinskas S, Asta P, Solveiga B, et al. The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance in a volatile environment as moderated by organizational inertia[J]. Baltic Journal of Management, 2013, 8(4):376-396. [12] Becker K. Facilitating unlearning during implementation of new technology[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2010, 23(3):251-268. [13] Holan P M D, Phillips N. Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(11):1603-1613. [14] Achrol R S. Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1991, 55(4):77-93. [15] Garg V K, Walters B A, Priem R L. Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(8):725-744. [16] Gilbert C G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(5):741-763. [17] 何建洪, 贺昌政, 罗华. 创新型企业的形成: 基于网络能力与战略创新导向影响的研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(2):127-137. [18] 卢艳秋, 赵英鑫, 崔月慧, 等. 组织忘记与创新绩效: 战略柔性的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(3):58-65. [19] Jansen J J P, van den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11):1661-1674. [20] 吴晓云, 张峰. 关系资源对营销能力的影响机制: 顾客导向和创新导向的中介效应[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(2):58-68. [21] Godkin L, Allcorn S. Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change[J]. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 2008, 8(1):82. [22] Hannan M T, Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82(5):929-964. [23] Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions[M]. : Sage, 1991. [24] Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2013. [25] 白景坤, 王健. 环境威胁与创业导向视角下的组织惰性克服研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2016(9):180-192. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期:2021-06-02.宁波大学学报（理工版）网址:http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金（19YJC630153）;山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究（2019w188,2020w222）;太原工业学院学科带头人支持计划（2020XKRW02）. 第一作者:郭秋云（1981－）,女,河北邢台人,博士/副教授,主要研究方向:组织学习、知识管理.E-mail:43816276@qq.com *通信作者:周晖杰（1979－）,男,浙江宁波人,副教授,主要研究方向:能源环境经济技术分析.E-mail:zhouhuijie@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
