基于综合集成赋权法的集装箱港口集疏运绩效评价
PDF下载 (2234)胡玉洁,王育红.基于综合集成赋权法的集装箱港口集疏运绩效评价[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2021,34(3):84-90.DOI:
HU Yujie,WANG Yuhong.Performance evaluation of container port collecting and distributing system based on combination weighting method[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2021,34(3):84-90.DOI:
| Title: | Performance evaluation of container port collecting and distributing system based on combination weighting method |
| 作者: | 胡玉洁, 王育红 |
| Author(s): | HU Yujie, WANG Yuhong |
| 关键词: | 集装箱运输; 港口集疏运; 综合集成赋权法; 绩效评价 |
| Keywords: | container transportation; collecting and distributing; performance evaluation indicators; combination weighting; performance evaluation |
| 分类号: | U169.62 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 既有的交通运输行业绩效评价指标多是基于单种运输方式进行定义和统计, 不能满足未来以“协同”为典型特征的集装箱运输发展要求. 本文从运输能力、集疏运成本、服务质量和可持续性4个方面入手, 为集装箱港口3种集疏运方式建立统一的绩效评价指标体系. 为了充分反映客观信息和决策者的主观经验, 将层次分析法(主观赋权法)与熵值法(客观赋权法)相结合形成综合集成赋权法计算每个指标的复合权重, 并以宁波舟山港为研究对象, 对方法的合理性和有效性进行了案例验证和敏感性分析. 研究结果与宁波舟山港集疏运发展现状基本一致, 从而验证了指标体系的可行性, 为深入研究未来集装箱多式联运系统绩效评价提供了科学有效的指标依据. |
| Abstract: | The existing indicators for transportation performance evaluation are mostly defined and calculated based on a single transportation mode, which cannot meet requirements of container transportation development characterized by “collaboration” in the future. A unified performance evaluation index system is established for the container port collecting and distributing system from the perspectives of transportation capacity, costs of collecting and distributing, service quality and sustainability. In order to fully reflect the objective information and the subjective experience of decision-makers, the combination weighting method is applied in this study to calculate combination weight of each indicator. Beilun Port Area of Ningbo Zhoushan is taken as the research object to prove rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method. Research results are basically consistent with development status in quo of Beilun Port Area’s containercollection and distribution. Therefore, the indicator system established in this research is considered feasible. This article provides a scientific and effective indicator basis for in-depth study of the performance evaluation on container multimodal transport system in the future. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] 原方方. 试论我国多式联运的发展现状及应对对策[J]. 科技视界, 2020(24):140-141. [2] 朱吉双. 沿海港口集装箱集疏运结构评价指标及其测算方法研究[J]. 综合运输, 2020, 42(8):1-7; 34. [3] 杨磊. 基于系统工程的多式联运绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2019, 41(8):64-67; 76. [4] Litman T. A good example of bad transportation performance evaluation[R]. Victoria, Canada: Institute of the Transportation Engineers, 2008. [5] Jeffs V P, Hills P J. Determinants of modal choice in freight transport[J]. Transportation, 1990, 17(1):29-47. [6] Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E. Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies, and case studies[M]. 2nd ed. : McGraw-Hill, 2003:23-41. [7] Feo M, Espino R, García L. A stated preference analysis of Spanish freight forwarders modal choice on the south-west Europe Motorway of the Sea[J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18(1):60-67. [8] Reis V. Analysis of mode choice variables in short distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 61:100-120. [9] Arencibia A I, Feo-Valero M, García-Menéndez L, et al. Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 75:252-267. [10] Larranaga A M, Arellana J, Senna L A. Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in do Sul[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 102:202-211. [11] Mohri S, Haghshenas H, Salehi V. Two levels modelling of container choosing and mode choice between road and rail for increasing the containerized rail modal share[C]. 15th World Conference on Transport Research, Mumbai, 2019. [12] Nugroho M T, Whiteing A, de Jong G. Port and inland mode choice from the exporters’ and forwarders’ perspectives: Case study — Java, Indonesia[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2016, 19:73- 82. [13] 宋力. 考虑碳税的集装箱货运方式选择模型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. [14] 卢星儒, 杨菊花, 温永瑞. 基于最优组合赋权的货运方式选择可变模糊模型研究[J]. 铁道货运, 2017, 35(1): 16-22. [15] 李哲契. 对路网评价技术指标选用的探讨[J]. 上海公路, 1995(2):6-8. [16] 张生瑞, 邵春福, 严海. 公路交通可持续发展评价指标及评价方法研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2005, 18(2):74-78. [17] 朱兴琳. 新疆公路网现状分析与综合评价[J]. 交通标准化, 2008(10):189-193. [18] 聂英杰. 中长期铁路网规划技术评价指标体系的研究[J]. 铁道勘察, 2011(2):86-89. [19] 刘新民, 王琪, 孙秋霞. 基于云物元模型的城市道路级配评价研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(4):34-41. [20] Hu W, Wu C. Urban road network accessibility evaluation method based on GIS spatial analysis techniques[J]. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2011, 38:114- 117. [21] Feng T, Zhang J. Multicriteria evaluation on accessibility- based transportation equity in road network design problem[J]. Journal of advanced transportation, 2014, 48(6):526-541. [22] Lazda Z, Smirnovs J. Evaluation of road traffic safety level in the state main road network of [J]. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 2009, 4(4):156-160. [23] Hanaoka S, Kunadhamraks P. Multiple criteria and fuzzy based evaluation of logistics performance for intermodal transportation[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2009, 43(2):123-153. [24] 张雯. 我国集装箱海铁联运的效率评价研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2014. [25] 朱汉民, 姚华, 刘斌. 集装箱多式联运效率评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2018, 40(5):8-14. [26] Janic M. An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS)[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(10):1326-1339. [27] 王伟, 李锐, 王书培. 基于DEAHP的港口集装箱海陆联运效率评价[J]. 现代交通技术, 2017, 14(2):72-74; 80. [28] 杨非, 张建平, 谢方泉, 等. 基于变异系数的EWM-G1管制运行效率主客观综合赋权评价方法[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2020, 18(3):126-132. [29] 陈芳, 罗云. 管制员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1):17-23. [30] 付强. 煤巷围岩稳定性评价指标权重确定方法[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(3):199-202; 207. [31] 付, 祝诗蓓, 楼小明, 等.浙江集装箱运输物流发展的问题与对策[J]. 浙江经济, 2020(2):66-67. [32] 曾庆成, 于婷. 基于码头集卡共享的运输任务分配优化模型[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2020(1):64-70; 79. [33] 杜启文.“丝绸之路经济带”下的中欧集装箱运输系统优化研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018. [34] 刘铁鑫. 面向复杂货流的综合运输组织方式优化研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2010. [35] 黄一展, 马江浩, 朱道立, 等. 上海港内河水-水中转集疏运模式研究[J]. 上海管理科学, 2019, 41(2):23-30. [36] 交通运输部. 2019年交通运输行业发展统计公报[J]. 交通财会, 2020(6):86-91. [37] 金曦. 长江中下游江海直达集装箱班轮航线优化研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2016. [38] 张戎, 诸立超, 陶学宗. 基于混合Logit模型的饶甬运输链选择行为分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(1):138-143. [39] 尚欢. 集装箱公铁联运成本模型的构建与应用[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015. [40] 董岗. 外部成本下成都—洋山港区集装箱集疏运体系的均衡研究[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2011, 32(3):38-42; 63. [41] Tyagi M, Kumar P, Kumar D. Assessment of CSR based supply chain performance system using an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach[J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2018, 21(4):378- 406. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期:2020-11-16.宁波大学学报（理工版）网址:http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目:浙江省“钱江人才计划”D类资助项目（QJD1802022）. 第一作者:胡玉洁（1995－）,女,河南周口人,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向:多式联运.E-mail:3087163985@qq.com *通信作者:王育红（1979－）,男,英国籍,博士/教授,主要研究方向:综合交通运输.Email:wangyuhong@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
