无痛分娩过程中的转剖宫产指征分析
PDF下载 (2233)崔可可,金 磊,赵清振,金彬杰,王正春.无痛分娩过程中的转剖宫产指征分析[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2021,34(3):96-99.DOI:
CUI Keke,JIN Lei,ZHAO Qingzhen,JIN Binjie,WANG Zhengchun.Analysis of clinical indications of cesarean in the process of painless delivery[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2021,34(3):96-99.DOI:
| Title: | Analysis of clinical indications of cesarean in the process of painless delivery |
| 作者: | 崔可可, 金 磊, 赵清振, 金彬杰, 王正春 |
| Author(s): | CUI Keke, JIN Lei, ZHAO Qingzhen, JIN Binjie, WANG Zhengchun |
| 关键词: | 无痛分娩; 自然分娩; 剖宫产率; 剖宫产指征 |
| Keywords: | painless delivery; transvaginal delivery; cesarean section rate; indications of cesarean section |
| 分类号: | R719.8 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 无痛分娩技术能有效缓解生产疼痛, 降低剖宫产率, 在临床得到广泛推广, 然而目前并不完全清楚无痛分娩对母婴是否足够安全, 也没有研究调查无痛分娩过程中转剖宫产指征的情况. 本文通过分析无痛分娩过程中转剖宫产的常见临床指征, 探讨无痛分娩对母婴的可能影响. 采用麦迪斯顿麻醉系统收集宁波大学医学院附属医院2018年1月至2019年3月入院进行阴道分娩的产妇的临床资料. 将进行无痛分娩产妇作为观察组, 自然分娩产妇作为对照组, 比较两组分娩过程中转剖宫产率及转剖宫产临床指征比率的异同. 在分娩过程中, 观察组(1844例)的转剖宫产率(6.29%)远远低于(P<0.0001, 2=288.75)对照组(2514例)的转剖宫产率(32.10%). 进一步分析发现, 观察组的头位难产指征比率(73.28%, n=85)、宫内感染指征比率(42.24%, n=49)以及胎儿宫内窘迫指征比率(37.07%, n=43)均显著高于(P<0.01, 2=6.68; P<0.0001, 2=36.64; P<0.0001, 2= 188.92)对照组的相应指征比率(60.84%, n=491; 3.84%, n=31; 14.37%, n=116). 与先前的报道一致, 使用无痛分娩技术的确可以显著降低产妇在分娩过程中转剖宫产的比率, 然而, 无痛分娩过程中转剖宫产的头位难产、宫内感染或胎儿宫内窘迫指征的可能性风险也显著提高. |
| Abstract: | Painless delivery effectively alleviates pain of delivery and reduces cesarean section rate, which makes it a commonly used approach in practice. However, it remains unknown whether painless delivery was safe enough for both mothers and infants. By analyzing several clinical indicators of cesarean section during painless delivery, the possible effect of painless delivery on mothers and infants was investigated. The clinical data of women admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University for vaginal delivery from January 2018 to March 2019 were collected by using the Megaston anesthesia system. The observation group (painless delivery) and the control group (natural birth) were used to compare the cesarean section rate and the clinical indications of cesarean section. The cesarean section rate in the observation group (6.29%, n=1844) was significantly lower (P<0.0001, 2=288.75) than that (32.10%, n=2514) in the control group. Further analysis showed that the cephalic dystocia rate (73.28%, n=85), the intrauterine infection rate (42.24%, n=49), and the fetal distress rate (37.07%, n=43) in the observation group were significantly greater (P<0.01, 2=6.68; P<0.0001, 2=36.64 and P<0.0001, 2=188.92) than those in the control group (60.84%, n=491; 3.84%, n=31 and 14.37%, n=116). Consistent with previous reports, painless delivery significantly decreased the rate of women transferring to cesarean sections during delivery processing. However, the possibility of head dystocia, intrauterine infection, or fetal distress during painless delivery also significantly increased. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] Kabiri D, Masarwy R, Schachter-Safrai N, et al., Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 220(4):336- 347. [2] Koridze S, Kintraia N, Machavariani P. Cesarian section - higher rate and higher challenges[J]. Georgian Medical News, 2015, 246:13-17. [3] Rizzo D, Giustiniano E, Cascini V. Epidural analgesia for painless delivery: Our experience[J]. Minerva Anestesio- logica, 1999, 65(10):711-715. [4] 吴建平. 无痛分娩, 你该知道这些[J]. 江苏卫生保健, 2019(5):36. [5] 周意园. 无痛分娩对剖宫产率及指征变化的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(4):723-725. [6] 董慧. 2960例剖宫产主要原因分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健. 2010, 25(13):1777-1778. [7] 于朝华. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019, 13(15):52-53. [8] 张利鸽. 无痛分娩技术对产妇各个产程的影响分析[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2019, 26(17):28-29. [9] Zakerihamidi M, Roudsari R L, Khoei E M. Vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section: A focused ethnographic study of women’s perceptions in the north of Iran[J]. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 2015, 3(1):39-50. [10] Dickinson J, Paech M, McDonald S, et al. The impact of intrapartum analgesia on labour and delivery outcomes in nulliparous women[J]. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2002, 42(1):59-66. [11] 温凤云, 刘凡, 王晓娟. 无痛分娩技术在产科临床的应用研究[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2019, (15):98; 152. [12] Alakeely M, Almutari A, Alhekail G, et al. The effect of epidural education on primigravid women’s decision to request epidural analgesia: A cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018, 18(1):124-129. [13] 花静, 刘铭, 严晓玲, 等. 以Robson十分类法为基础的剖宫产率关联因素和预测效度[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2017, 20(2):104-109. [14] Moradi F, Aryankhesal A, Heidari M, et al. Interventions in reducing caesarean section in the world: A systematic review[J]. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 2019, 26(5):21-37. [15] Zarifsanaiey N, Bagheri A, Jahanpour F, et al. Effect of an interactive training on choosing delivery method among primiparous pregnant women: An interventional study[J]. Invest Educ Enferm, 2020, 38(1):e4. [16] 石昭学. 无痛分娩对降低剖宫产率的价值及对剖宫产指征的影响分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2018, 37(31):16-18. [17] 孙建红. 徒手旋转在头位难产产妇助产护理中的临床应用效果[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019, 13(20):123- 125. [18] Liang Q F, Xi J, Wang X H, et al. Changes and analysis of transvaginal forceps delivery rate in primary hospitals in the past 10 years[J]. Ginekologia Polska, 2019, 90(12): 711-716. [19] 皇甫英, 叶小丽, 李爱武. 宫内感染92例临床分析[J].中南医学科学杂志, 2015, 43(3):311-313. [20] 陈丽英, 黄爱月, 谢梅娟, 等. 产妇胎儿宫内窘迫的原因及护理分析[J]. 青岛医药卫生, 2017, 49(2):148-150. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期:2020-04-24.宁波大学学报（理工版）网址:http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ 基金项目:国家自然科学基金（31800874）;浙江省自然科学基金（LY21C090001）;宁波大学王宽诚幸福基金. 第一作者:崔可可（1997－）,女,安徽蚌埠人,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向:精神病与精神卫生学.E-mail:863140310@qq.com *通信作者:王正春（1986－）,女,山东临沂人,博士,主要研究方向:神经精神药理学.E-mail:wangzhengchun@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
