浙江省海洋经济核心区“三群”协调发展度研究—–基于系统的耦合分析
PDF下载 (275)周 艳,钟建军.浙江省海洋经济核心区“三群”协调发展度研究—–基于系统的耦合分析[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2019,32(6):103-109.DOI:
.[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2019,32(6):103-109.DOI:
| 作者: | 周 艳, 钟建军 |
| Author(s): | 周 艳, 钟建军 |
| 关键词: | 港口; 临港产业; 城市; 耦合度; 耦合协调度 |
| Keywords: | port; port-vicinity industry; city; coupling degree; coupling coordinative degree |
| 分类号: | F061.5 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 以浙江海洋经济核心区—–宁波舟山港为研究对象, 构建港口经济、临港产业经济和城市经济的复合系统的评价指标体系, 采用熵值法和层次分析法对各指标进行权重赋值; 运用综合评价模型、耦合度和耦合协调度模型对宁波舟山港2005~2017年“三群”的协调发展度进行了实证分析. 结果显示: 宁波舟山港的港口经济、临港产业经济与城市经济的发展状况逐年好转, 其中发展水平与增速最快的是城市经济; 2005~2015年宁波舟山港“三群”的整体动态协调程度处于低位发展阶段, 系统处于轻度失调阶段, 2016年起步入协调阶段; 3个子系统之间的互动逐步向更高程度的耦合协调阶段发展, 且提升空间较大. |
| Abstract: | In this paper, we take Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, the core area of marine economic in Zhejiang province, as the research object, to construct the comprehensive evaluation index system of the coupling system composed by port, port-vicinity industrial and city. We use the method of entropy values and AHP to weight each index, and use the comprehensive evaluation model and coupling coordination degree model to conduct the analysis on the coordinated development of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port from 2005 to 2017. The results indicate that the development of port, port-vicinity industry and city in Ningbo-Zhoushan Port has improved annually, and the highest development level and growth is evidently correlated to the city’s economy subsystem. In the course of the investigation, it is found that the overall dynamic coordination degree of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port is at the low development stage with the system in the stage of slight imbalance. Since 2016, it has entered into the coordination stage, and been gradually developing up to a higher level of coupling coordination stage. There is still much space to improve the level of the coordinated development. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1].贺建时, 唐德中. 海外港口、产业及港城联动发展研究[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 1996, 9(3):78-82. [2].Benito G R G, Berger E, de la Forest M, et al. A cluster analysis of the maritime sector in Norway[J]. International Journal of Transport Management, 2003, 1(4):203-215. [3].de Langen P W, Visser E J. Collective action regimes in seaport clusters: The case of the Lower Mississippi port cluster[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2005, 13(2): 173-186. [4].Hollen R M A, van den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Strategic levers of port authorities for industrial ecosystem development[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2015, 17(1):79-96. [5].Myrdal G, Sitohang P. Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions[M]. New York: Harper & Row Publisher, 1957:23-38. [6].Fujita M, Krugman P R, Venables A J. The Spatial Economy Cities, Regions, and International Trade[M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999:19-35. [7].张道刚. “产城融合”的新理念[J]. 决策, 2011(1):1-2. [8].Zou D L, Cong H B. Data driven based coordinated development pattern and influencing factor analysis using spatial and temporal data[J]. Cluster Computing, 2017, 7: 1-17. [9].Bird J H. Seaports and Seaport Terminals[M]. London: Hutchinson University, 1971:1-26. [10].Charlier J. The regeneration of old port areas for new port uses[C]//Hoyle B S, Hilling D. European Port Cities in Transition. London: Belhaven Press, 1992:137-154. [11].Notteboom T E. Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2005, 32(3):297-313. [12].Wang J J, Olivier D. Port-FEZ bundles as spaces of global articulation: The case of Tianjin, China[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38:1487-1503. [13].He D, Sun Z, Gao P, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of the port-hinterland relationship: A case study of the midstream Yangtze river, China[J]. Growth and Change, 2019, 50:1043-1061. [14].Cerceau J, Mat N, Junqua G, et al. Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: International overview of case studies and cross-case analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 74:1-16. [15].Hiranandani V. Sustainable development in seaports: A multi-case study[J]. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2014, 13(1):127-172. [16].Chen C, Jasmine S L L. Sustainability and interactivity between city and ports: A two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach[J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 2018, 45(7):944-961. [17].Khalin V, Kiely N. Degradation or regeneration? Prospects for developing the port-city interface in Odesa[J]. Urbani Izziv, 2019, 147(1):129-143. [18].王珍珍, 李雪莲. 海西“产业-港口-城市”三群联动的共生系统[J]. 厦门理工学院学报, 2013, 21(2):10-14. [19].刘松先. 港口群、产业群与城市群共生系统演化与培育[J]. 厦门理工学院学报, 2014, 22(2):18-23. [20].战磊, 李芸. 江苏沿海开发中的港产城联动: 动因、问题与路径[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014(8):47-52. [21].韩红莲, 李惠茹. 建设沿海经济强省下河北“港产城”联动策略研究[J]. 港口经济, 2013(6):16-18. [22].沈锋. 以港产城联动推动沿海工业园区发展探讨—–以浙江嘉兴滨海新区为例[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2016(11): 23-26. [23].徐质斌. 关于港城经济一体化战略的理论思考[J]. 港口经济, 2004(6):30-31. [24].蒋柳鹏, 封学军, 王伟. “港口-产业-城市”复合系统协调度模型[J]. 水利经济, 2011(1):11-14; 18. [25].赵巍, 高彤. 连云港“港-产-城”联动发展协调度评价研究[J]. 郑州航空工业管理学院学报, 2016, 34(2):23-27. [26].Vefie I. The Penguin Dictionary of Physics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1996:92-93. [27].吴跃明, 张翼, 王勤耕. 论环境-经济系统协调度[J]. 环境污染与防治, 1997, 19(1):20-23. [28].庞娟. 北部湾城市群、产业集群与工业园区耦合联动发展研究[J]. 现代商业, 2019(10):81-82. [29].李剑, 徐潇, 姜宝. 港口群、城市群与产业群互动关系研究—–以环渤海地区为例[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2012(3): 24-26; 50. [30].邵贞, 战磊. “港产城联动”的绩效评价与优化路径—–基于耦合系统模型的分析[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2018(7):17-22. [31].钱丽, 陈忠卫, 肖仁桥. 中国区域工业化、城镇化与农业现代化耦合协调度及其影响因素研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2012(1):10-17. [32].Xu S, He W, Shen J, et al. Coupling and coordination degrees of the core Water-Energy-Food nexus in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental? |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期: 2019?07?09. 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址 http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/基金项目: 浙江省自然科学基金（LQ14G030004, LQ16G030003）; 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金; 宁波市社科规划项目（G15-2-07）.第一作者: 周艳（）, , 浙江宁波人, 讲师, 主要研究方向: 港口经济学. E-mail: zhouyan2@nbu.edu.cn*通信作者: 钟建军（1984－）, , 江西宜丰人, 讲师, 主要研究方向: 国际经济学. E-mail: zhongjianjun@nbu.edu.cn表综合发展水平 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
