基于DEA-CA-MI的全国沿海主要港口运营效率评价
PDF下载 (15490)隋晓艳 1,姜桂艳 1,2,3,4,曹朋亮 1,杜春承 1.基于DEA-CA-MI的全国沿海主要港口运营效率评价[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2018,31(1):82-88.DOI:
SUI Xiao-yan 1,JIANG Gui-yan 1,2,3,4,CAO Peng-liang 1,DU Chun-cheng 1.Evaluation of national coastal major ports’ efficiency based on DEA-MI-CA method[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2018,31(1):82-88.DOI:
| Title: | Evaluation of national coastal major ports’ efficiency based on DEA-MI-CA method |
| 作者: | 隋晓艳 1, 姜桂艳 1, 2, 3, 4, 曹朋亮 1, 杜春承 1 |
| Author(s): | SUI Xiao-yan 1, JIANG Gui-yan 1, 2, 3, 4, CAO Peng-liang 1, DU Chun-cheng 1 |
| 关键词: | 沿海港口; Malmquist指数; 聚类分析; 效率评价 |
| Keywords: | DEA-CA-MI; coastal ports; DEA; Malmquist index; cluster analysis; efficiency evaluation |
| 分类号: | U693 |
| 文献标识码: | A |
| 摘要: | 为揭示我国沿海港口运营效率及其发展态势, 运用DEA-CA-MI方法, 对全国沿海37个主要港口在2009~2014年间的运营效率进行静态和动态评价. 结果表明: 我国沿海主要港口运营效率的水平、结构与发展态势存在较大差异; 在静态评价中, 港口综合技术效率与港口平均规模之间存在倒“U”型关系, 纯技术效率不高是导致港口运营效率水平偏低的主要影响因素; 在动态评价中, 除福州港外, 其他港口的运营效率在评价期内均有所改善, 全要素生产率指数及其离散程度随港口规模增加而减小. |
| Abstract: | In order to reveal the operational efficiency and development trend of China’s coastal ports, DEA, CA and MI methods are used to conduct static and dynamic evaluation of 37 major national costal ports from 2009 to 2014. The results show there are great differences in the level, structure and development trend of the operation efficiency of main coastal ports in China. In the static evaluation, there is an inverted “U” relationship between the port’s comprehensive technical efficiency and the average port size. Additionally, the low purely technical efficiency is the main factor which leads to the lower operational efficiency of ports. In the dynamic evaluation, besides Fuzhou port, the operating efficiency of other ports have improved during the evaluation period, the total factor productivity index and its dispersion degree decrease with the increase of port size. |
| 参考文献 /References: | [1] Roll Y, Hayuth Y. Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis[J]. Maritime Police and Management, 1993, 20(2):153-161. [2] Tongzon J L. Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A (Policy and Practice), 2002, 35:113-128. [3] 王玲, 毕志雯. 基于三阶段DEA模型的我国主要内河港口效率研究[J]. 产业经济研究, 2010(4):40-49. [4] Chudasamma K M, Kiran P. Measuring efficiency of Indian ports: An application of data envelopment analysis[J]. The ICFAI University Journal Infrastructure, 2008, 6(2):45-64. [5] 李兰冰, 刘军, 李春辉. 两岸三地主要沿海港口动态效率评价—–基于DEA-Malmquist全要素生产率指数[J]. 软科学, 2011(5):80-84. [6] Barros C P. Productivity assessment of African seaports[J]. African Development Review, 2012, 24(1):67-78. [7] 曹玮, 于清波. 基于DEA和Malmquist指数的福建沿海港口效率分析[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2013, 30(4):89-96. [8] Willmsmeier G, Tovar B, Sancgez R J. The evolution of container terminal productivity and efficiency under changing economic environments[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2013, 8(3):50- 66. [9] Ding Z Y, Jo G S, Wang Y, et al. The relative efficiency of container terminals in small and medium-sized ports in China[J]. The Asian Journal Shipping and Logistics, 2015, 31(2):231-251. [10] Martinez B E, Diaz A R, Navarroi M, et al. Study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis[J]. International Journal of Transport Economic, 1999(XXVI):237-253. [11] Martinez B, Muhammad Z S. Technical efficiency analysis of container terminals in the middle eastern region[J]. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2015, 31(4):477-486. [12] Charens A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978(2):429-444. [13] Banker R D. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operations Research, 1984, 17:35-44. [14] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some model for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9):1078-1092. [15] 魏权龄, 岳明. DEA概论与C2R模型―数据包络分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1989(1):58-69. [16] 陈珊珊, 刘桂云. 基于DEA模型的集装箱港口柔性服务效率评价[J]. 宁波大学学报(理工版), 2016, 29(3):128-132. [17] 沈毅, 陈锋. 六种常见的条件系统聚类法比较[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2004, 21(6):338-340. [18] 周开乐, 杨善林, 丁帅, 等. 聚类有效性研究综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(9):2417-2431. [19] Caves D W, Christensen L R, Diewart W E. The economic theory of index numbers and measurement of input, output and productivity[J]. Economic, 1982, 50:1393-1414. [20] Fare R, Grosskopf S, Russell R. Index Numbers: Essays in Honor of Sten Malmquist[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998:85-101. [21] 成钢, 钱振华. 基于相邻共同参比方法的Malmquist模型[J]. 系统工程, 2012, 30(2):105-109. |
| 备注/Memo: | 收稿日期: 2017－03－06. 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址: http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目（71431001）; 包兆龙包玉刚中国留学生奖学金.第一作者: 隋晓艳（1989－）, 女, 黑龙江齐齐哈尔人, 在读硕士研究生, 主要研究方向: 港口物流. E-mail: 965040516@qq.com*通信作者: 姜桂艳（1964－）, 女, 黑龙江鸡西人, 博士/教授, 主要研究方向: 智能运输系统. E-mail: jiangguiyan@nbu.edu.cn 宁波大学学报（理工版）网址：http://journallg.nbu.edu.cn/ |
